Dr Thomas Schelling
was a different sort of Nobel-prize winning economist –let’s call him a ‘hatke’ economist - who worked on the
fascinating science of game theory and its utility in the cold war and in
nuclear strategy. He presented an unusual option in cold war negotiation –
which remains as debated as it is controversial – that went as follows:
One side in a
negotiation can strengthen its position by narrowing, not expanding, the
options available to it.
Imagine that there are
two drivers driving towards each other on a collision course (I am getting
nervous writing about it!). One must
swerve, or both may die in the crash.
But if one driver swerves and the other does not, the one who swerved
will be called a ‘chicken’, a coward, the one who blinked first.
Your first reaction is
likely to be, ‘…but this will never happen.
Humans love their lives way too much.’
Well, sorry to disappoint you, but it happened for half a
century after the Second World War, when the two superpowers drove towards each
other. It happens – with lower
consequences – in traffic jams, when people refuse to move and glare with hostility. It happens in conflicts at
home and at work.
So, it happens.
The fear of being
labelled a chicken triggers the aggression (both emotions emanating from the
amygdala).
So, ol’ Schelling
suggested that one option could be that one of the drivers who is hurtling
towards the other could rip the steering wheel from the steering column and
brandish it so that his opponent can see that he no longer controls the car.
Have you done this?
(no, not while driving, but while negotiating….)
No comments:
Post a Comment